One of the most frustrating aspects of the whole Creation/Evolution debate is the fact that so much of the evidence presented in school textbooks, science journals and consequently the secular news media is just partial evidence. People can be made to believe just about anything if they are only given part of the evidence, but when all of the evidence is presented, the truth has a funny way of coming out. Have you ever wondered why so many evolutionary scientists fight legally to stop school districts from debating the facts of evolution? Why all the legal battles to keep evolution from being debated? The fact is there are mountains of scientific evidence which supports Creation and destroys evolutionary theory. One small example is something we call the Micro/Macro deception. Here's how it works.
First, let's examine the word "evolution". In the literal sense, "evolution" is not a bad word. It merely means "change over time". We all change over time, so in the strictest literal sense, we "evolve". Our thinking even "evolves" as we get older. But that's not what the evolutionists mean when they tell us humanity "evolved" from a common ancestor. That's where the Micro/Macro deception comes in.
Micro-evolution is a common occurrence and we see it all the time in living organisms. It is nothing more than a shuffling of current genetic information to adapt to changing environmental conditions. For example, a study of Cane toads in Australia revealed that over a span of 70 years, the toads with longer legs tended to survive because they could run and leap farther and faster, thereby avoiding becoming some animal's lunch. Consequently, the shorter legged toads died out. All of the toads had it within their genetic structure to develop longer legs, so whenever the occasional toad would be born with a dominant "longer leg" gene, he would have an advantage over his brother toads, tend to survive and then pass that dominant gene onto his tadpoles and before you know it, the whole Cane toad population "micro-evolved" longer legs.
If you put some dogs on an island where the climate was too cold for their fur, eventually a dog will be born with a dominant gene for thicker fur and he will survive, pass that gene onto his puppies and over time you will see that the dogs will have "micro-evolved" thicker fur. This is the same thing that was observed in the Galapagos Islands with regards to Darwin's finches. Certain finches developed different shaped beaks over time to adapt to the types of food available. In all of these cases with the finches, the toads, the dogs etc., the changes they experienced were already built into their genetic codes. That is critical to remember. At no time did a single piece of new, ADDITIONAL genetic information develop in any of these cases. It was merely a shuffling of EXISTING genetic information. (Remember that, you'll see why)
This "Micro-evolution" is fully accepted by Creation Scientists. It has always been seen as an example of God's brilliance in creating all life forms with more genetic information than they use at any given time. This allows them to adapt to various environmental changes in order to survive. This is the sign of a smart God. Now let's go to "Macro-evolution".
"Macro-evolution" is what is currently being taught today as the explanation for the origins of humanity. For those Cane toads to "Macro" evolve, they would need to evolve into a completely different species. So here's the dirty little secret the evolutionists don't like talking about. There is no evidence anywhere on the Earth, nor has there ever been any evidence of any animal Macro-evolving into a completely different kind of animal. The finches stayed finches, the toads stayed toads. If the kind of evolution being taught to us now were true, those toads would evolve into non-toads, maybe a bird or possibly eventually a lizard or perhaps a cow someday.
For this to happen (and here comes another dirty little secret), the evolving animal would have to produce offspring with NEW, ADDITIONAL genetic information. That has never been observed in the history of mankind. That's right. In all of the testing being done in all the laboratories and zoos by scientists worldwide, there has never once been an example of even one animal giving birth to an offspring with new, additional genetic information. Only a shuffling of existing genetic information. So if the evolutionists are right, we are forced to believe that for billions of years, life has evolved from amoebas in the oceans all the way up through the food chain, growing and increasing in complexity and design, adding new genetic information generation after generation in millions of species for millions of years, but suddenly today when we have modern technology, laboratories, scientists and the cameras rolling so we can see it for ourselves, it just suddenly doesn't happen anymore. It really does take more faith to believe in evolution than Creation.
What's so dishonest about the whole evolution debate though is that evolutionists fill our textbooks and science journals with "examples" of evolution occurring all the time, but if you read what the actual examples are, you see that they are all the "micro-evolution" examples from earlier. That's right, 100% of all "proof" of evolution occurring is nothing more than certain features on animals making slight changes in shape or size, but staying the very same kind of animal. Some dolphins may develop longer or shorter fins, but they have never grown wings and then evolved into a bird. The evolutionists know this, and so they point to these genetic adaptations within a species and say "look, evidence for evolution". It's the Micro/Macro deception. They are hoping that by showing you the ways a horse can genetically develop different breeds of size and shape, you will take that as evidence the horse used to be a whale. Remember, a dolphin developing longer fins is not in any way evidence that dolphins used to, at one time, be non-dolphins. So it is, in my opinion, very dishonest to use examples of commonly accepted micro-evolution as so called evidence for the Theory of Evolution, or Macro-evolution.
You may say "well it takes millions of years for those dogs to evolve into a cow", but remember, it only takes one day for an animal to be born with new, additional genetic information and since that is required for evolution to be true, and it supposedly has been happening through billions of years of evolution, we should today, still see that happening everyday, yet of all the millions upon millions of animals born worldwide day after day, week after week, year after year, the percentage of current animals born with new, additional genetic information is 0.0%. It has never once, ever been observed.
The "TOP 10 PROOFS EVOLUTION IS SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE" audio 2 CD set has over 2 hours of fascinating scientific evidence showing that Biblical Creation is actually the most logical and scientific explanation for the origins of humanity. It is presented in simple layman's terms that are easy to understand and remember and will equip you to defend the faith like a pro.
This audio sample comes from a Top Ten Proofs product: